Commons:Administrators' noticeboard
This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reportswikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergencywikimedia.org. | |||
---|---|---|---|
Vandalism [ ] |
User problems [ ] |
Blocks and protections [ ] |
Other [ ] |
Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.
|
Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.
|
Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.
|
Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS. |
Archives | |||
112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 |
95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
| ||
Note
- Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (
~~~~
), which translates into a signature and a time stamp. - Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s).
{{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN|thread=|reason=}} ~~~~
is available for this. - Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.
Tag creation request
In the past, I have requested creation of specific tags for each OpenRefine minor version: openrefine-3.7
, openrefine-3.8
and so on. It's probably not so useful to have such a granularity so I would request the creation of the (hopefully last) tag: openrefine
, which would be used by all future OpenRefine versions (>= 3.9). Would an admin be able to create it? Thank you! − Pintoch (talk) 13:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done As there has been no objection Pintoch, I've gone ahead and created this tag. —RP88 (talk) 21:21, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
File:HongkongersUK.jpg
Please delete and block--and maybe check CU. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 22:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Convenience link: File:HongkongersUK.jpg. - Jmabel ! talk 13:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Massive backlog in User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands/Category moves
The semi-automatic category move function on CommonsDelinker had been really congested by pending requests since 2023, and even without reviewing the whopping number of mass category move requests (currently 19), the number of standalone requests are also high.
I would be grateful if some admin can look through the problem and at least approve some of the less controversial ones. Many thanks.廣九直通車 (talk) 07:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Have been working through standalones for the last few days. Abzeronow (talk) 22:09, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your contributions!廣九直通車 (talk) 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you for volunteering to work on these pending requests. -- Ooligan (talk) 00:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Boulder dedicated to Jonathan Baldwin Turner's speech at the 1851 Granville Convention.jpg
Hi! I have been directed from VRT to ask an admin/license reviewer to double check the license status of File:Boulder dedicated to Jonathan Baldwin Turner's speech at the 1851 Granville Convention.jpg (I had originally forwarded an email with permission to VRT, but that was rendered moot because the website updated the license). Would someone be able to do a quick license review ? Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk) 01:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done Ellywa (talk) 08:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Fake descriptions
Old thread was archived without resolution of the problem, yet something needs to be done with numerous files. Siradan (talk) 12:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion review
Can I have a second opinion on the speedy deletion of File:Atago fukaya factory.jpg and File:Atago fukaya factory 2.jpg? They were speedy-deleted without standard user talk page notification. If "no license" was the problem, I think the uploader could have added one, if notified. There were other procedural problems (unexplained removal of source information) that make the SD requests seem less valid.
Unless it turns out the files had other obvious problems than "no license", such as blatant copyright violation, I might suggest having a regular deletion discussion. If COM:UDEL is more appropriate, I'm happy to bring it to there. whym (talk) 08:39, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Whym: This wasn't done over-speedily: it sat marked for a week. At any time during that it could have been turned to a regular DR, but it's a bit late for that.
- At this point I believe we would have to go through an undeletion request, which would be entirely reasonable.
- Originally it was claimed as "own work". That was removed by the nominator without explanation. It had a license completely compatible with the claim of "own work". No one indicated why "own work" was doubted. - Jmabel ! talk 14:22, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice, Jmabel. Will Krd change mind in light of this? I just thought that if there was a simple mistake or something, they might want to have the chance to undo it first. If not, I'm happy to move onto a proper undeletion request. whym (talk) 03:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Add file to deletion discussion
File:El Presidente de Chile Gabriel Boric junto al Primer Ministro de Haití Ariel Henry.jpg has been nominated for deletion. Please add the deletion notice to its derivative File:Ariel Henry July 2023.jpg, as it is currently protected. @Bagumba for awareness. Robertsky (talk) 08:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done I also notified admins at ptwiki so they can remove the image from the main page if they want. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
uselesscontributions} 09:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Weather at Commons
It's not directly an admin issue, but as admins are expected to moderate discussions here, or at least stop users from getting carried away.
I get the impression that the weather at Commons is somewhat bad these days for professional photographers. Some users who may consider that commercial photography is not a profession, craft or art to practice seem to work hard towards what might actually drive them away to other platforms. The same may eventually make use loose GLAMs who less directly benefit from contributing here, but are also paid for their work. Enhancing999 (talk) 14:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Is there an example where admins acted in an unfriendly way in discussions? There are often different options on certain topics but the language in discussions is mostly respectful. GPSLeo (talk) 17:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oh not all. They are somewhat careful to not involve themselves. Enhancing999 (talk) 17:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, what do you mean with "somewhat careful to not involve themselves"? GPSLeo (talk) 19:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oh not all. They are somewhat careful to not involve themselves. Enhancing999 (talk) 17:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Shouldn't this be at VP unless I'm missing something, how is this related to admins? —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
uselesscontributions} 20:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)- The community chose admins to moderate discussions around here. So they can't really do much more. It's for admins to ensure the weather doesn't become bad for our core contributors, preferably (moderately) friendly. Enhancing999 (talk) 09:26, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- If there is a person or persons you think has done something wrong, please be specific, preferably with diffs. No one can respond usefully to a vague statement that the atmosphere here feels hostile. - Jmabel ! talk 02:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- i just wanna say:
- sysops are entrusted with only 3 additional buttons: delete, protect and block.
- sysops are not "moderators of discussions". those 3 buttons are technical, nothing to do with "moderating discussions".
- if every user uses commons sense and etiquette, there is no need to moderate.
- if it's really necessary to have someone "moderate", any reasonable user (instead of only sysops) can voluntarily do that.
- RZuo (talk) 11:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyright infringement as Media of the Day
The current movie that's the Media of the Day "is a 1958 American comedy-drama film of Erskine Caldwell's 1933 novel of the same name." That is, if the underlying work is still copyrighted (ala many deletions of Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck), then the film is protected, at least in the derivative parts. Erskine Caldwell's 1933 novel was renewed, with renewal id R256172, and thus the movie will be under copyright until at least 1933+96, or 2029. As it is a media of the day, I can't nominated it for deletion. Prosfilaes (talk) 00:22, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Looking —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Prosfilaes Nominated for deletion and removed from the main page. I think the movie is actually still copyrighted itself and a derivative work of the still-copyrighted book. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 29 April 2024 (UTC)