Comments on: Robert Ingersoll on Blasphemy https://www.atheists.org/2013/09/robert-ingersoll-on-blasphemy/ Protecting the absolute separation of religion from government. Tue, 28 Mar 2017 15:32:04 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 By: Guest https://www.atheists.org/2013/09/robert-ingersoll-on-blasphemy/#comment-2278 Thu, 10 Oct 2013 21:59:00 +0000 http://news.atheists.org/?p=477#comment-2278 Very well put.

]]>
By: Susan Humphreys https://www.atheists.org/2013/09/robert-ingersoll-on-blasphemy/#comment-2277 Wed, 09 Oct 2013 13:42:00 +0000 http://news.atheists.org/?p=477#comment-2277 In reply to AllenG.

Actually it isn’t oppression to demand that no one gets to speak negatively ONLY if people are prevented or jailed or beaten for speaking negatively. BUT there are ways to respond to bullies without lowering yourself to their level of discourse. For one stick to the facts. If something is your opinion state it as such. TRUTH needs no claim of divine authorship, wise words stand on their own merits. Address the issue not the person making the comments. This means you need to be prepared, do your homework, educate yourself, know your opponents arguments inside and out. Don’t or at least try not to get drawn into playing games of “tit for tat” (insult for insult). If necessary cut off the discussion if someone gets too abusive by simply saying you won’t talk with them until they clean up their act. stop the name calling and personal insults and address the issue responsibly.

]]>
By: AllenG https://www.atheists.org/2013/09/robert-ingersoll-on-blasphemy/#comment-2276 Wed, 09 Oct 2013 13:27:00 +0000 http://news.atheists.org/?p=477#comment-2276 In reply to Susan Humphreys.

The basic rules of human interaction suggest that intentionally offending people on a personal level is not a good idea. While that may entail the use of blasphemy, the problem is not the blasphemy, but making personal insults in direct interaction with other people on a personal level, whether you are addressing a sacred belief or their choice of hairstyle or car color. But when people publicly and openly advance a belief or idea, it is oppression to demand that no one else gets to speak negatively of that belief for fear of offending people who hear it in the public sphere.

]]>
By: Susan Humphreys https://www.atheists.org/2013/09/robert-ingersoll-on-blasphemy/#comment-2275 Tue, 08 Oct 2013 21:22:00 +0000 http://news.atheists.org/?p=477#comment-2275 I think the question should be whether one has the right, or whether it is right to intentionally offend someone by denigrating their beliefs or something they hold to be sacred? This is about how we as individuals chose to deal with religious differences. There are instances where oppression needs to be challenged BUT is it oppression that holds a book to be sacred or oppression that burns that book or oppression that declares how the book burner is to be dealt with? The first is NOT an instance of oppression the last two are.

]]>
By: trog69 https://www.atheists.org/2013/09/robert-ingersoll-on-blasphemy/#comment-2274 Mon, 30 Sep 2013 22:30:00 +0000 http://news.atheists.org/?p=477#comment-2274 In reply to kebm.

Exactly right. Look at all the injuries to his name, the patriarchy, the trivial becoming deadly, and it could only have come from the minds of men.

Women, you get a pass on this one. In fact, if you were to use reason and logic, you’d be objectively anti-biblical in your beliefs, even if you chose to worship your Jesus.

]]>
By: kebm https://www.atheists.org/2013/09/robert-ingersoll-on-blasphemy/#comment-2273 Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:57:00 +0000 http://news.atheists.org/?p=477#comment-2273 I stopped believing in blasphemy along with everything else thankfully. Blasphemy cannot exist if there is no god to offend and if it were real, I wouldn’t want to worship a god that gets his feelings hurt over a little ol’ blasphemin here and there. This brings me to a very important point. How could “bible god” be truth when it is taught that god loves us and is angered by blasphemy. He takes vengeance on idol worshipers. These are all human emotions. How could an all powerful being be subjected to different states of emotions that impare judgement and skew logic.

]]>